On April 22, 2025, a deadly terrorist attack shocked India. Militants ambushed a civilian bus in Pahalgam, Jammu & Kashmir, killing 26 individuals — 25 Indian nationals and one Nepali citizen. The attack bore hallmarks of groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed, both with known roots in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK).
Public outrage, diplomatic protests, and national mourning followed. Indian intelligence soon traced the origin of the attackers to terror infrastructure in Pakistan.
🔷 Key Events Leading to the Strike
April 22, 2025 – Pahalgam terror attack kills 26 civilians.
April 23–May 5 – High-level intelligence assessments confirmed launch points in PoK and Pakistani Punjab.
May 5 (Night) – Indian Armed Forces receive final strike orders.
May 6, 2025 | 2:30 AM IST – India launches Operation Sindoor, targeting nine key terror hubs using precision-guided weapons.
May 7, 2025 – Indian government and media confirm the operation.
Operation Sindoor: The Offensive Date of Execution:
Early Morning of 6 May 2025, at approximately 2:30 AM IST
Objective: To neutralize terror launchpads without violating international borders
Locations Targeted:
Bahawalpur (Jaish-e-Mohammed HQ)
Muridke (Lashkar-e-Taiba base)
Muzaffarabad, Kotli, Bhimber, Bagh (PoK regions)
Chak Amru, Sialkot, Gulpur (other staging areas)
Mode of Strike:
Stand-off loitering munitions
Satellite-guided missiles
No manned aircraft or direct airspace violation
🔷 Additional Facts
- Code Name ‘Sindoor’: Symbolic of sindoor worn by married Indian women — a nod to the widowhood forced by terrorism.
- Pakistan’s Claim: Pakistan alleged civilian deaths, damage to a mosque, and claimed to have downed two Indian drones.
- India’s Position: Asserted that only terror infrastructure was targeted, with no civilian sites struck.
- Casualty Report: India claims 17 terrorists killed and 60 injured.
🔷 Legal Dimensions and International Law
⚖ Right to Self-Defence
India invoked Article 51 of the UN Charter, which affirms the inherent right of nations to defend against armed attacks. The doctrine of anticipatory self-defence also applies, as India acted to prevent further cross-border attacks.
⚖ Comparison with Precedents
- Surgical Strikes (2016) – Post Uri attack
- Balakot Airstrike (2019) – After Pulwama bombing
Both set the precedent for targeted, non-intrusive retaliation under evolving interpretations of international law.
🔷 Global Response
- United Nations: Called for restraint, but acknowledged India’s right to protect its citizens.
- United States, France, and Saudi Arabia: Condemned terrorism and urged de-escalation.
- China: Urged “both sides” to maintain peace, but refrained from condemning the Pahalgam attack.
🔷 Conclusion
Operation Sindoor marks a calibrated shift in India’s counter-terror doctrine — striking deep, but lawfully, with technological precision and strategic messaging. It underscores India’s evolving approach: no tolerance for terror sanctuaries, and no need for overt war to send a message.
As the geopolitical temperature rises, India’s legal and moral claim to self-defence may become the basis of a global discussion on state-sponsored terrorism and proportional response.
📢 Your Opinion Matters!
Do you believe India was justified in launching Operation Sindoor?
Share your views in the comments below and stay updated with all legal developments on www.kanoonplus.com
✅ Follow Kanoonplus for real-time legal coverage:
YouTube: https://youtube.com/@kanoonplus
Website: https://www.kanoonplus.com
WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaAUNStCcW4y5IUhaW1G